Monday, 4 July 2011

Spot the odd one out...

Spot the odd one out.

- over 3000 boer farmers have been murdered
- The Afrikaners are the descendants of Jews in Africa and God's chosen people
- 2+2 = 5
- H.I.V is now an airborne disease that kills 100% of people it infects within 14-25 days.


Did you get it ? It was pretty easy right ?

The answer is there is no odd one out. They are all complete rubbish.

Unless you are thinking in the context of Adriana Stuijt. A mad horrid old crone responsible for the laughable censorbugbear load of tosh I ripped to pieces in my blog http://www.listconspiracy.blogspot.com/ .

Then there is an argument that even that mad old bat knows 2+2 =5 so that s the odd one out , except then truth be told she also knows 3000 boers weren't murdered (because she knowingly posted the names of people who are not dead, n0t white, mostly nor farmers and since 1987 in her list of less than 1200 names), and she surely sucked the hiv rubbish and jewish links you are going to read out of somewhere stupid and ignorant. As you are about to see when interviewed by Jeff Rense.

Now it breaks my heart to say this as probably my best friend in the world is a Rense follower. But the man has a radio show that presents conspiracy theories from David Ich Lizard men to Aliens and Bigfoot etc as valid. It's a testament to how far out there this batshit crazy old tramp is featured by her. Anyway...for your enjoy...the lady that started the "boer genocide" nonsense  (which I showed to be a total myth) may I present...H.I.V is an airborne disease that kills 100% of people within 14-20 days !!!!



Final chuckle.


This interview was at least 3- 4 years ago !!!

I think if there was anything truth to what she is saying (which there almost never is) we'd have heard something about this by now ?

How you like you're "boer genocide" heroine now chumps ?

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha !!!!

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

I never read a word of your propaganda but I wanted to share with you that you really are a special piece of shit...:)

The Rooster said...

Yet I bet you read every word from the rampant bullshitters that make up the extreme right..read it and lap it up like honey from a dew flower.

It's called a confirmation bias. Hint : Try reading what I write sometime. You might find that I'm not the one spewing the propaganda.

Actually let me correct that.

You WILL find.

Anonymous said...

Sorry Rooster but your timing is absolutely appalling (refer the Heidelberg couple that were slaughtered at the weekend)

Now I know you are trying prove a point here but it comes across as callous and insensitive...Why always the "bwahahahahaha" when you deal with this issue?

Boertjie said...

My knowledge is way out of date but I believe the world's 3 deadliest virusses is (in no specific order)

-HIV
-Rabies
-Ebola

Which one takes the no 1 spot depends on the criteria for "deadliest".

If the main criterium is most people killed, then no1 is AIDS. For the least survivors from untreated infection, no 1 would be rabies. For the most virulent, Ebola takes first place.

Hope I made someones day interesting with this...

The Rooster said...

It goes without saying the murder is disgusting and I heard they caught the dogs that dig it. I hope they throw them into a pit and burn the fuckers alive.

My laughter is at Adriana stuit and her warmonger extreme right loony volkstaters with their soothsayers and blood lust. They sat down in a room and decided they were going to try and piss white people off into a race war through a web of lies and deception (or at least hyperbole, sensationalism and devision). And everytime I help just one young chap see through their develish game I jump for joy.

The Rooster said...

If the main criterium is most people killed, then no1 is AIDS.

__________

I think you're wrong. Other than the obvious "cancer" (which most people who die of "natural causes" actually have a form of anyway. But ignoring that, Maleria is still the biggest killer disease to my knowledge. Certainly in Africa anyway.

Anonymous said...

Actually the deadliest disease is ignorance. Just read many of these blogs.

1. over 3000 boer farmers have been murdered

According to the TAU its more like 1,000 and that appears to have included all colours.



2. The Afrikaners are the descendants of Jews in Africa and God's chosen people

That has come out of the South African white community for more than 4 generations. You might want to open the Afrikaans Bible and see:


Deut 23 Vers 2: Geen baster mag in die vergadering van die Here kom nie. selfs sy tiende geslag mag in die vergadering van die Here nie kom nie.


No black person may appear before GOD hence only whites go to heaven. Very odd when you consider that in English it says - no BASTARD may appear before GOD. How did illegitimate become black?


3. 2+2 = 5

Yes this is correct. See the 'farm genocide' calculations.


4. H.I.V is now an airborne disease.

This is correct. Human Ignorance Virus is the most deadliest disease in the world. It is transmitted by air but also via the internet. You better put a tin foil hat on your head and condom on while surfing the internet.

The Rooster said...

Actually the deadliest disease is ignorance. Just read many of these blogs.

1. over 3000 boer farmers have been murdered

According to the TAU its more like 1,000 and that appears to have included all colours.



2. The Afrikaners are the descendants of Jews in Africa and God's chosen people

That has come out of the South African white community for more than 4 generations. You might want to open the Afrikaans Bible and see:


Deut 23 Vers 2: Geen baster mag in die vergadering van die Here kom nie. selfs sy tiende geslag mag in die vergadering van die Here nie kom nie.


No black person may appear before GOD hence only whites go to heaven. Very odd when you consider that in English it says - no BASTARD may appear before GOD. How did illegitimate become black?


3. 2+2 = 5

Yes this is correct. See the 'farm genocide' calculations.


4. H.I.V is now an airborne disease.

This is correct. Human Ignorance Virus is the most deadliest disease in the world. It is transmitted by air but also via the internet. You better put a tin foil hat on your head and condom on while surfing the internet.


________________

He he. Nice.

Boertjie said...

Oops...forgot about malaria being the biggest killer disease in Africa.

Let me amend my previous statements: as far as I know ebola, aids and rabies is the deadliest VIRAL diseases.

Anonymous said...

Rooster, I find it amusing that you accuse this woman of wildy exaggerating facts and figures but then you post this load of horseshit and do exactly the same thing by distorting the orginal message. Case in point: "...H.I.V is an airborne disease that kills 100% of people within 14-20 days !!!!" Actually they were talking about a strain of TB that was shown to have HIV markers in its DNA. It has fuckall to do with HIV in the state we know it.

Whether or not there is/was any truth to all this is irrelevent as far as my point goes. Maybe when you're on your next frantic mission to discredit someone you should go for solid facts instead of proving yourself of being something you apparently despise so much - a hypocrite.

Dachshund said...

Adriana Stuijt was twice married to Robert van Tonder who was leader of the Boerstaat Party and who died in 1999. As Islandshark and Ron. of ILuvSA like putting up posts about van Tonder and his Boerstaat vision, you can safely assume that ILSA's agenda has turned into one of bringing about a Boerstaat but excluding those Afrikaners who didn't take part in the long walk called the Great Trek. Really petty crap, and a pipe dream that can never be realised. And don't you come and say it's my or anyone else's fault that it will never be realised. It will never be realised because you old Boers fight too much among each other and then you look for someone else to blame. You need only look at the story about the punch up at the VVK in Krugersdorp recently to see how vulgar the infighting gets.

pincer said...

You are busy with bean counting to the disadvantage of the overall picture in this country.

The overall picture does not look good in comparison to pre 1994, and for that matter the censorbugbear website plays a usefull role for exposing crime in a concise manner for reference purposes not easily found on other websites, until such day that a more scientific approach has been found (which is currently being investigated by a number of organisations).

The government has the resources for the creation of a much more comprehensive database, the attempts of private individuals will be of a lesser nature, but that does not mean that the overall picture is completely incorrect.

As for Genocide, the staged definition of Dr. Stanton at least brought in a systematic approach to a very difficult topic. Hy is not a nobody in the world. The point is that genocide has shown a staged pattern, and that one must be aware of that.

For example the murder of Germans in Poland before World War II followed a much more closer staged pattern to what is happening in South Africa.

http://www.thefuhrerbunker.com/WWII.htm

All the anti-German sentiment due to a misplaced nationalistic fervor ended in a final slaughter at Bromberg 'Bloody Sunday'.

Are we going to wait for a 'bloody Bromberg Sunday' in South Africa?

The Rooster said...

The overall picture does not look good in comparison to pre 1994,

_______________

What a load of crap ! pre 1994 we had how many people with electricity, running water and a decent chance of medical care or diet ?

20% ?

Maybe at best.


We had double the voilent crime. While now we have 80% of people with electricity etc. Shut the fuck up you total crazy ass loon.

The Rooster said...

As for Genocide, the staged definition of Dr. Stanton at least brought in a systematic approach to a very difficult topic. Hy is not a nobody in the world. The point is that genocide has shown a staged pattern, and that one must be aware of that.



___________________

Genocide ? What is to stop me laughing you off the table when 1500 people get murdered here (South Africa)a month with perhaps 1 or 2 (at most) being white farmers and above 90% being black or coloured males ?

pincer said...

Swearing is also an argument.

Please stay with the topic - crime. One topic after another - the one with water, electricity and decent medical care can follow later.

Double the violent crime? Please state a reference to this claim. Where are the pre-1994 stats?

Farm murders 1 or 2 a month - where are the stats? Why does one have to go to the censorbugbear website instead of a government site, which has the resources for a comprehensive analysis?

Where are the statistics? It must be readily available. It is not readily available. Why not?

Without statistics one has to work by the inductive or deductive method.

You have a masters degree. You should know this.

The Rooster said...

Hi Pincer. The murder rates for South Africa are made up through various cross referencing bodies. Morgues, Death certificates, police reports, independent actuaries etc. It is published every single year since 1994. Conveniently it was not published before that because it was always staggeringly high amongst poor (black and coloured)South Africans.

In 1994 it was 70 per 100 000. It is now 34 per 100 000. That's a 50% reduction in prevalence.

http://mg.co.za/article/2009-12-03-murder-down-30-since-1994-research-shows

Even the D.A are happy to accept this figure and had mild compliments in its direction.

Personally I don't attribute the A.N.C to this improvement rather I say it's because of social upliftment and less poverty. South Africa has grown its GDP massively the past decade.

The only stat of farm murders I know of was undertaken by the T.A.U who came up with a number of 1200. That included people of all races (workers, visitors etc.) They recently made this claim if you followed ther "Malema hate speech" fiasco. Adriana flat out lies to claim she is possession of any contrary information. She actually unwittingly linked me to another list thinking like her usual lemmings I would not read it. Again it was mostly non whites,and mostly attacks rather than murders.

What possible reason would I have to lie about any of this ? Repeat : I do not deny that many awful murders have happened on farms in S.A. They are repugnant and indeed an outcry is always warranted. But to distort it and turn it into malicious race based divisive propaganda surely is also not a noble cause and does nothing but fuels the fire between races in this country and needlessly terrifies many people.

pincer said...

'Blogger' is somehow giving troubles while I am posting. I will first see if my comments have gone thru before a post another part.

The Rooster said...

Well you're not being censored in case you are wondering.

pincer said...

The problem seems to be Blogger, which restricts the number of characters that may be placed at a time. So I will try rephrase a lengthy reply in a nutshell. I will expand on a reply, so as to make it easier to read.

There must be raw historical data at SAPS apart from morgues and other places. That data must be in SAPS IT division. Internet came to South Africa in about 1995. Before that all data was processed by electronic data processing by batch on a mainframe driven by legacy software, reports printed out on line printers (old technology), data saved on magnetic tape and the reports copied to microfiche. The raw data was placed on records with field layouts, mostly matching questionnaires in the data capturing process. Before one has no access to those data sources, one cannot draw a correct crime picture of the past. Those records must still exist, and the computer programs too (old backups) with their specifications.

It was a long winded process in the old days and data/information only available on request by interested parties. Because in order to publish reports, you first had to send the raw line printer reports to the state printers to convert it in a booklet format.

The S.A. government kept meticulous records in those days. Publishing of crime statistics was not kept back ‘due to the high crime’ but due (1) complicated printing process due to old technology did not make publications generally available, but they were available to interest groups on request (2) some IT was not done by South Africa but by the independent homelands before they were reincorporated into the republic.

Boertjie said...

@ pincer

I have given the genocide-talks quite some thought and made my case to Rooster under his post "So it's over, I win".

Perhaps take a look?