Tuesday, 19 July 2011

This is what we've come to...

32 comments:

Dachshund said...

So now we finally know that women can be just as nasty as men. QED.

The Rooster said...

...and get away with it. Unlike men.

The Rooster said...

Women are and always have been the far inferior examples of humanity. Point to any heroic, noble, selfless etc in history and at the root of it will be a man.

I will admit that if you point to anything notworthably horrid a man was probably also responsible.

But you know. When you look at it. Women are hardly sentient.

The Rooster said...

Now that I think about it never seen a group of men sit around laughing about the mutilation of a womans genitalia.

Even one that cheated on a man, but these women admit they don't even know what he did.

In fact I don't think men would find it funny at all even if she was a serial killer. But you know, after watching such videos you can expect a backlash from men. It would take the most half hearted 5 minute effort from men with our superior brains(fact) and know how to have women docile as puppies again.

Careful ladies. Tread on egg shells.

Dachshund said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dachshund said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
The Rooster said...

Thanks for the stereotypical advice. I've lived 7 years throughout Asia. China is the last frontier of that continent for me. Chinese women are lovely by the way. Certainly not as beautiful as Vietnamese perhaps but certainly the worst on their worst day are still 50 rungs above your average western, entitled, masculine sweaty, swamp hog.

Dachshund said...

"Women are and always have been the far inferior examples of humanity." If women are so vastly, massively inferior to men, then doesn't it make sense to date guys? Could it be that guys who complain such a lot about women in reality can't do without them? When I was single in my 30s I met so many divorced men who complained and complained about their exes, it was like they could never get over their ex. I think this is why men should marry young, and stick to their marriage, and work hard to support their wife and kids, otherwise they become self absorbed bores. Anyway, I don't want to get too deeply into this argument, as I've heard the same story so many times already. But if your relationships are not up to scratch, then maybe you need to look a little deeper and not blame it on the butch swamp hogs of PE.

The Rooster said...

My girlfriend is not South African although she does live here. And she has a very low opinion of South Africans in general. Thinks you're a bunch of ugly, stupid inbred hicks. I say "you" because as thoroughbred arian I disown myself from your gene pool.

Dachshund said...

Well in that case you and your girlfriend should live elsewhere. And here I have to agree with what blacks say about whites, that even the liberal ones are racist as hell.

The Rooster said...

Did you miss the whole "I'm leaving thing ? "

The Rooster said...

And I was never out to sell rainbows and bunnies to anyone. I never pretended to be some saint. Just because I don't think their is any value to offer by being extremely conservative and hateful of others and perpetuating the cycle, doesn't make me a hippie. It just makes me practical and smart.

Dumb fucking country with a death wish. That's South Africa.

Dachshund said...

Yes I know you're going to China. Is the girlfriend going with you?

Dachshund said...

Why don't you just forget about ultra conservative people who read Tom Clancy novels and listen to Steve Hofmeyr? They're not my target market, for that matter, either.

Dachshund said...

Why don't you make this young guy your black contributor?

Sipho Hlongwane
Should South Africa's black people get over apartheid? Hell, no!

I’ve just about had it with being told to “get over apartheid”. It is a deeply dishonest assertion to make. And honesty is a vital step in this scary and confusing journey we’ve taken together as South Africans.

Last week I was invited by Yfm to attend a dinner. It was part of a “Generation Y” series of discussions that aims to reawaken the spirit of the youth in confronting our own problems. The keynote speaker at this particular discussion was Nkosinathi Biko, son of struggle stalwart Steve Biko.

As I sat there in the ballroom at the swish Hyatt Hotel in Rosebank, surrounded by accomplished, well-read and well-spoken young South Africans, it hit me that the majority of young South Africans weren’t represented in the room. Take a South African between the ages of 18 and 24: chances are he or she is unemployed, unemployable with little or no chance of getting ahead in life.

Yet there we were, tweeting on our Blackberrys, mocking each other’s Model-C accents, brushing our car keys away to make room for the cabernet sauvignon that was being passed around. We were talking about the problems facing young South Africans and we weren’t hearing from those who are hardest hit by poverty, poor education, unemployment and crime. What right did we have to speak for them?

Why are more than 50% of young people in South Africa unemployed? Whose fault is that?

Here’s an outrageous idea – it is apartheid’s fault. That is the reason why apartheid was such a horrible thing. It not only disenfranchised the majority of South Africans based on their skin colour, it did its damndest to make sure they would forever be poor and uneducated. Its effects will remain with us for decades, perhaps even centuries.

Apartheid’s victims should remain angry as long as its effects are with us.

A mistake that is always made (and will no doubt be repeated in the comments below this column) is that whenever it is said that black anger at apartheid should not subside, we mean that blacks should be angry at apartheid beneficiaries. No. Blacks should be angry at apartheid because trying to come to terms with it in any other way will blunt the eagerness of our response to it. Our solutions in 2011 will not be as vigorous or thorough as they should be. (Here’s another outrageous idea – could this partly explain why our government fannies about with its responses to the poverty problem; they’re not angry enough?)
Source: http://www.thedailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2011-07-04-should-south-africas-black-people-get-over-apartheid-hell-no

Anonymous said...

Rooster, how can you of all people, for even one millisecond try to justify what you're saying here?!

Women were treated like dirt for a very long time. And for that, womankind will have have all of eternity to prove themselves as equals of men - no matter what, pal. It's their time now! Viva! Women were not allowed to vote...they were not allowed to visit the same places that men were...they've even been forced, that's right, FORCED to use a separate room from men when doing something as quintessentially human as performing basic ablutions for the love of all that is good! In essence, they were simply treated as ANIMALS!!! DO YOU HEAR ME? You READING ME, CUNTPLASM!? HUH?!!! And now you, in all your CHAUVINISTIC GLORY, you chauvinistic........chauvinist -- you roll in here and DARE to cast the godly female in such a light! It's a pity-parade...and a pah-THETIC one at that, son!

Starting to sound familiar at all, ladies and gents? lol. And don't get me started on the irony...the frothy fowl feathers would fly...

The Rooster said...

Women were treated like dirt for a very long time.

__________________

They were ? Where ? Western society ? What utter rubbish !


Humans were treated like dirt for a very long time. Soon after the rennaisance when things started to get slighly unbarbaric women were treated as priveledge members of society in western civ.
__________________
And for that, womankind will have have all of eternity to prove themselves as equals of men - no matter what, pal.

____________

Women aren't the equals of men. They fashione obsessed brain deads for the most part. Who invented absolutely everything ? Who are the great doctors, scientists, cosmologists, artists , musicians, fucking chefs for fucks sakes ? Who are the great heroes of self sacrifice in history ?

Clue: not women.

_____________

It's their time now! Viva! Women were not allowed to vote

_____________


Most men were not allowed to vote right into the 19th century you fucking moron. And yes it certainly is womens times (zionists ensured that).

Women have never been unhappier, divorce rates are through the roof. Women now have to work. Over 70% of violent criminals come from single mothers (apparently Oprah thinks single mothers are some sort of heroes for getting pregnant out of wed lock )
_________________
...they were not allowed to visit the same places that men were...they've even been forced, that's right, FORCED to use a separate room from men when doing something as quintessentially human as performing basic ablutions for the love of all that is good! In essence, they were simply treated as ANIMALS!!!

__________________

What crap. Women have been treated in western civ far closer to princess than animals. It's men who ride on the back or the garbage trucks. Men who are sent to fight the wars. Men who lay every brick and pipe that has ever been laid. Mern who risk their lives kilometers under the earth so women can have their pretty diomonds. Fuck off you callous twat !

___________________
DO YOU HEAR ME? You READING ME, CUNTPLASM!? HUH?!!! And now you, in all your CHAUVINISTIC GLORY, you chauvinistic........chauvinist -- you roll in here and DARE to cast the godly female in such a light! It's a pity-parade...and a pah-THETIC one at that, son!
_________________

Chauvanistic. How has that become an insult ? Should we also make a insulting word for parents who realise that children require special help and right too ? Am I a chauvanist ? I don't think so in the sense you are trying to imply. But I really wouldn't care if I was if it meant I recognise the inherant self praining ruin women are bringing to the world.


_______________--
Starting to sound familiar at all, ladies and gents? lol. And don't get me started on the irony...the frothy fowl feathers would fly...

_______________

Please explain where I have held anyone to a lower standard than I have held women ? I think there's more irony in your post that 500 articles on this website. But what can I say ? I'm just fucking smarter than you.

Bye exzanyasfuck. And post under your real name. Unlike you and livesonacrapcoldshittyisland shark I con't censor my site. Verkrampte ballies.

The Rooster said...

Guys admit it. Nothing like watching me tear into a petchulant post is there ? I'm sort of the best really.

Fuck I love myself. Real ubermensch.

Dachshund said...

".. you roll in here and DARE to cast the godly female in such a light!"

What did you say? GODLY? You think you're godly? Please, if religion hadn't been invented by men, you'd still be rolling around in a swamp. Take your ideas of earth goddess and what you think is godly, and go sing them on cloud nine.

I have, perhaps mistakenly, equated feminism with equality, meaning, you wouldn't do to someone else what you wouldn't want to have done to yourself. So what makes it ok for the same women who are horrified by date rape to joke about male genital mutilation? And don't give me the story about the saintliness of motherhood.

Camille Paglia:

"Mothers can be fatal to their sons. It is against the mother that men have erected the towering edifice of politics and sky-cult. She is Medusa, in whom Freud sees the castrating and castrated female pubes. But Medusa's snaky hair is also the writhing vegetable growth of nature. Her hideous grimace is men's fear of the laughter of women. She that gives life also blocks the way to freedom. Therefore I agree with Sade that we have the right to thwart nature's procreative compulsions, through sodomy or abortion.

"My explanation for the male domination of art, science, and politics, an indisputable fact of history, is based on an analogy between sexual physiology and aesthetics. I will argue that all cultural achievement is a projection, a swerve into Apollonian transcendence, and that men are anatomically destined to be projectors. Women have conceptualized less in history not because men have kept them from doing so but because women do not need to conceptualize in order to exist. No woman has to prove herself a woman in the grim way a man has to prove himself a man. Male bonding is a self-preservation society, collegial reaffirmation through larger, fabricated frames of reference. Culture is man's iron reinforcement of his ever-imperiled private projections.

Sexual personae, Camille Paglia.

End of sermon. Oh, and I never could stand my mother. Female bonding is the biggest myth ever progagated.

The Rooster said...

Datchs...nice. I didn't know that was in you. I find it very appealing and impressive when a women shows self critique.

The Rooster said...

Sipho and and anyone who wants to help contribute to this blog are more than welcome. I am extremely unprecious about what this space becomes as long as people are still talking about the mental illness of negativity South Africa suffers from.

Dachshund said...

Not self critique. I've transcended feminist self righteousness. I'm very wary of women who still call themselves feminists, they'll stab another woman in the back just as quickly as they'll cut off some guy's cock.

The Rooster said...

Very true. Nobody hates women more than radical feminists. Worthless fucking tramps they are.

Dachshund said...

You're telling me, Rooster. The appalling way Lara Johnstone stalked and harassed Patricia de Lille, that was a shocker. These diesel dykes behave in exactly the same way as criminal males. This is because they take on what they assume to be typical male brutishness without any of the redeeming qualities of a civilised man.

The Rooster said...

Lara Johnstone ?

That bitch is fucking crazy.

The Rooster said...

You must read the crazy shit she's emailed to me when I confronted her about Adirian's knowing lies. Talk about head up your ass.

But then these right winged crazies always develop an unhealthy crush on me.

Anonymous said...

Guys, the "Rooster, how can you of all people..." response was simply showing up Rooster for the hypocritical poesneus that he is. It had nothing to do with women at all. I thought a clue may have come in using Rooster's own personal trademarked insult; cuntplasm.

For Rooster, the self-righteous, white-hating, black-loving, self-proclaimed master of all things moral and just in this world, to come along with this bare-faced rant about women is just laughable.

Dooster, your long winded, unread response was truly a waste of time, champ. Congratulations on patting yourself on the back over it though.

Dachshund said...

Ooooh and you didn't take up the offer to get naked with baboon-in-heat Johnstone! She's got the major hots for Mike Smithie. Man, that redneck Dutchman turns her on. Lara sees nothing odd about having been married to a black convict - unless she thinks they're the only safe blacks around, but not to the point of whipping out the old intra uterine device - and then schmoozing up to a rightwing crackpot like Mike. In typical baboon pack fashion she hoots praises for Mike Smith's "alpha" threatening of Renaldo Gouws. Concepts like aggravated menacing or common assault are too highbrow for her. Smithie fancies totally crazy she-boons. Do you remember Fuechs? All that heavy flirting in drunken German. And then when Citizen Kane, also a German, couldn't come up with a viable plan for a Boer/Volkstaat, Fuechsie had a go at him. "Du nervst! Du nervst!" That really conjured up an image of female grace and pulchritude. They're all such beauty queens, these right wing females!

Dachshund said...

Wraggies. "Poesneus". Dit is nie ordentelike taal nie. Is jy dalk Dan Roodt?

Dachshund said...

This is what some of those nice Afrikaners at Mike Smith's blog are thinking.
________________________

I think the best thing that could happen for all whites in this land (and i do pray for it) is something like uhuru, you need to wake people up, in the therapy world they call it gestalt therapy which they use to break a persons pattern.

The thing with crime is that it shocked whites but became the norm, what we need is the blacks to massacre just 1,000-5,000 whites (lets hope they know where the liberal suburbs are, if not i could always provide directions and be leading in the front.

1-5 k whites will not work, how do i know?

100,000 whites have been killed in various ways since 1994, 30,000+ farmers, 100,000+ in suburbs etc, these are the stats, it hasnt shocked anyone if anything whites still feel sorry for these savages.

we need around 50,000 white mother F*** liberal dooses to go in one night, in fact i wish it was more, they stand in the way of people like you and i who come to this site and want a clean, fair, crime free, politically sound environment to live in and is it so much to ask seen as though we are the cash cows funding the whole thing.

Anonymous said...

Dachshund, not sure who you suspect me to be I can assure you I'm not who you think I am, nor am I associated with Mike Smith and co. whatsoever. Hell, I'm a soutie for crying out loud.

The Rooster said...

lol at that guys massive failure of statistics. 30 000 whites have been murdered sine 1994 ? Grow the fuck up dude.