Sunday 16 May 2010

South Africa's rampant crime largely spares tourists

From here.

Every day South Africa sees about 50 killings, but the startling statistic masks enormous differences among violent crimes, which rarely affect tourists.

Crime remains one of the chief concerns in the run-up to the World Cup, where 373,000 foreign fans are expected to visit for the June 11 to July 11 championship.

One British tabloid recently warned of a "World Cup machete threat", while stab-proof vests are being marketed online with football insignia.

But South Africa ranks only 10th among the most dangerous countries for British tourists, according to the Foreign Office.

Of the 870,000 Britons who visited or lived in South Africa last year, only 139 needed consular assistance, against 5,500 in Spain and 2,000 in France.

Britons also have a greater chance of becoming hospitalised in Thailand, Greece, Egypt or India, where they can get mixed up in sexual or drug crimes, the ministry said.

While German football great Franz Beckenbauer has urged fans "to be watching out everywhere they go," the statistics show that tourists don't face a high risk of crime.

"In the first quarter of this year, there was not one incident of a German tourist travelling to South Africa that we know of that has become the victim of violent rime. There is no one," said Martin Schafer, spokesman for the embassy in Pretoria.

The French embassy said murders of tourists are so small that the mission doesn't even track them.

"In South Africa, 80 percent of the murders are between people who know each other, and more than 50 percent of those are committed under the influence of alcohol in a dispute that becomes more and more violent," said Gareth Newham of the Institute for Security Studies.

Crime is also very localised, mainly affecting the poorest neighbourhoods where tourists are unlikely to visit, he said.

"That's why most people who come here generally do not experience crime," he said.

"During the World Cup, stadiums, hotels, all the places where the tourists will be are going to be heavily policed... so it's very unlikely that there is going to be a high degree of violence."

That doesn't mean that thieves, pick-pockets and other petty criminals will disappear. In December, masked men broke into a hotel room and tied up two German tourists, robbing them but leaving them unharmed.

Even that risk will likely diminish because of South Africa's heavy security deployment during the games, Newham added.

South Africa has spent 1.3 billion rands (180 million dollars, 120 million euros) to to recruit, train and equip 41,000 new police.

Police chief Bheki Cele said South Africa now has 186,000 police for its 47 million people, compared to 140,000 police for 60 million people in Britain.

And he said the country is also preparing for the risk that foreigners could bring crime with them: South Africa will block 3,000 known football hooligans from Britain from entering the country.

Hooliganism is rare in South Africa, where football matches are family affairs.

"If it happens that they sneak in, they will move faster getting out of the country," Cele said.

Most at risk are the 80,000 visitors expected to come from neighbouring countries, people who are more likely to stay with friends or relatives in shantytowns that are the epicentre of South Africa's crime problem.

"Indications show that immigrants from Africa in South Africa have higher victimisation rates than South Africans," Newham said.

7 comments:

Exzanian said...

Mr Rooster, looking at the comments on this post, the one before it and the general dearth of comments previously, I gotta ask: are you posting negative "Anon" comments on your own blog? A bit of the old "false provokateur" perhaps, mmmm?

That's a sterile, honest question, so don't come out booting like a mad thing at me, when you ain't responding to the others...

The Rooster said...

I post less so the hits get less. If I was bothered I'd post more. I'm a very busy man. When things eays up I post more and my readers come back.

Anonymous said...

Quote: "I post less so the hits get less. If I was bothered I'd post more. I'm a very busy man. When things eays up I post more and my readers come back"

Even MORE horse-shit loser!
You NEVER had many readers to start with - why? - mainly because no-one else seems to be able to procure any of those rose tinted glasses that you consistently see through. Readers like BALANCED journalism - not self righteous denialist drivel from a middle class white wannabe babbling that everything is cool - FACT!
Try accepting that you cohabit the underbelly CAPITAL of the world together with Mafioso gangs, corrupt politicians, useless police, shitty hospitals etc and you MIGHT get a few readers!
FFS man, look around you - Kebble, Angliotti, Selebi, Jackson, George Louka, Melekile Hani etc etc
It reads like the SA Mafioso together with obligatory "hits" ordered left, right & centre.
Any you say everything is cool?
Time for a reality check twat!

FV De Wet said...

"Ok. I give in...by the sheer force of irritation I finally concede. As you can see I've gone and changed the name of the site. Part of me wanted to keep the old name out of spite until you learned to not take yourselves so seriously, but I suppose there is one thing White South Africans can do well (and only one thing) and that's whine and whinge and f#cking whine again"

If WHITES in this country come across as "WHINEY and WHINGEY and fucking whineY again". Please then tell me what you think about the ongoing strikes in this country and especially the BLACK population that seems to be just as, if not more, fucking whiney than the whites. Around every corner, they strike and toi toi constantly complaining about service delivery, not receiving their free houses faster, not getting job and not getting free education. Maybe you should, for the good of SA, direct you attentions and efforts to the other part of the population that seems only able to complain, while the WHITEY continues to pay his taxes and actually help the country develop and grow economically!!!

Anonymous said...

You should take a feather out of Rian Malan's cap as far as journalistic skills are concerned.
A totally factual article about the reality of the world cup fiasco. You'd get a LOT MORE hits if you told things how they really are!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2010/may/16/rian-malan-world-cup-south-africa

Anonymous said...

LOL, so you got banned from Mybroadband forum again:)

The Rooster said...

You should take a feather out of Rian Malan's cap as far as journalistic skills are concerned.
A totally factual article about the reality of the world cup fiasco. You'd get a LOT MORE hits if you told things how they really are!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2010/may/16/rian-malan-world-cup-south-afri

--------------

Lol, Rian Malan : Lord of noobs.

He says in his article : Now we're all saddled by debts it will take generations to pay off.

Lol is he serious ? The world cup costs were not even 0.01% of budget. Which in most years was not even all spent. saddled in Debt ? Fuck off Rian Malan you twat.