tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post2141071247036612625..comments2023-09-29T10:40:21.283+02:00Comments on Shut up Whitey: Update...another last word ?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger141125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-3553731303204742292012-01-08T21:11:38.594+02:002012-01-08T21:11:38.594+02:00Moerse groot blog wat jy daar geskryf het, Wynand....Moerse groot blog wat jy daar geskryf het, Wynand. Seker maar 'n helse klomp werk en navorsing.Katzenjammerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14075423195892830101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-16669873941290702062012-01-04T21:57:48.335+02:002012-01-04T21:57:48.335+02:00Julius Malema is steeds die president van die ancy...Julius Malema is steeds die president van die ancyl tot en met sy appel aangehoor is <br /><br />_______________<br /><br />He has zero percent chance of over turning his appeal, a fact he resigned to by taking a new post. So no, he is no longer the president of the Youth League. <br /><br /><br />So wherever you are getting your facts that are knowing lying to you.The Roosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16969529144574975152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-33365554308372220542012-01-04T21:54:55.905+02:002012-01-04T21:54:55.905+02:00ek stem glad nie met die stuk saam nie , maak moor...ek stem glad nie met die stuk saam nie , maak moorde af as niks word sommer kwaad amptelike syfers soos deur die polisie gegee is 2009 24000 + moorde 59 per 100 000 hoogste in die wereld 2010 was die term moord aangepas pm strafbare manslag uit te sluit en nog steeds 16000 moorde 45 per 100 000 sesde hoogste in wereld ,<br /><br />__________________<br /><br />Latest is 14 800 and with the increased population it is now 34 per 100 000. For whites it is much lower. For white women for example (according to medical research council who studied morgues by cause of death and race) showed it was 2.8 per 100 000 (about half the murder rate for the U.S.A).The Roosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16969529144574975152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-14052527346440774082012-01-02T08:00:38.500+02:002012-01-02T08:00:38.500+02:00ek stem glad nie met die stuk saam nie , maak moor...ek stem glad nie met die stuk saam nie , maak moorde af as niks word sommer kwaad amptelike syfers soos deur die polisie gegee is 2009 24000 + moorde 59 per 100 000 hoogste in die wereld 2010 was die term moord aangepas pm strafbare manslag uit te sluit en nog steeds 16000 moorde 45 per 100 000 sesde hoogste in wereld , transvaal landbou unie het sederd januarie 2010 besluit om nie meer plot moorde as plaas moorde te tel nie en die meeste moorde word op plotte gepleeg - die vermoordes weerspieel ook die populasie met 9% van die vermoordes wat blank is maar die verskil kom in die moordenaars wat meestal swart is miskien is 2% blankes en Julius Malema is steeds die president van die ancyl tot en met sy appel aangehoor is die stuk hierbo is nog groter disinformasie as wat Adriana deurgeewynandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16147372741606060991noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-22237711742091159042011-12-20T17:22:38.730+02:002011-12-20T17:22:38.730+02:00If you're interested in my altet ego (basicall...If you're interested in my altet ego (basically a spoof/lampooning of an extremist misanthrope heaped with ascerbic humour)check out my site : <br /><br />http://www.themcfearless.comThe Roosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16969529144574975152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-26439246288642038662011-12-18T16:10:32.892+02:002011-12-18T16:10:32.892+02:00Lastly the extreme right (or left but they don'...Lastly the extreme right (or left but they don't really bug my blog) , and thus my issues with them boils down to this : They actively seek to oppress human freedom in favour of their own personal selfish pursuits.<br /><br />Humanity has a long history of violence and war and chaos and it stems from the same basic principle : intolerance and emotionally comprimised beings. I stand for rationality and progress. Something I hope to maintain into my older years (should they come, as my enemies would point out medically I'm pretty much past my expiry date). And with that I hold dear a belief in an intrinsic potential for all humanity. To give up that belief is to become cynical beyond anything that is proactive. Reactive people add no value and has a poor understaing of basic netownian physics which are the most important laws that govern our lives. <br /><br />Hate bounces.The Roosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16969529144574975152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-53151405157376992122011-12-18T16:03:05.055+02:002011-12-18T16:03:05.055+02:00Same to you and yours Pincer. I enjoyed the debate...Same to you and yours Pincer. I enjoyed the debate and let's always remember it's just that. <br /><br />Except I do think if we take your views to their logical conclusion what we are proposing is massive oppression of sentient beings. Something I hope even you don't stand for. But that's between you and your consciousness. <br /><br />Life is short. We share the planet with all sorts of beings. I don't have the sociopathic megolamania in me and that's what is boils down to. If I exit this world without having hurt anyone I've met my responsibilities. That's athiest ethics for you. <br /><br />Why I'm demonised by the far right is a mystery to me. What I propose is extremely placid. Guys, let's not fuck other people other for our own gain. Let's treat all people/animals/beings with dignity and respect. If they won't reciprocate then at least we win the war ethically. <br /><br />To believe in anything less is to become a total nihilist and give up all hope for any meaning or goodness to this life. That's no way to live. Invest/care in your life and it's value and if you do surely you will have the empathy to see how others have the rights and aspirations to care about their own. <br /><br />Peace and love<br />RoosterThe Roosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16969529144574975152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-66988133663387463212011-12-18T12:12:34.982+02:002011-12-18T12:12:34.982+02:00To my knowledge homosexuality is at times extremel...To my knowledge homosexuality is at times extremely evident from a young age. Others times not evidnent at all late into life. If anything at all their is an anti homosexual social construct. Nothing in society is actively pushing people to be homosexual and prmoting it's virtues. (Not in our society). On the other hand various cultures have done so (romans for example)and it was met with enthusiasm. The result is probably that sexuality is to some extent hard wired but not nearly as polar as people would believe. I don't want to thumb suck but I remember reading that very few people aren't bi-curious. Seeing as I'm not one of them I suppose growing up around a rigidly homophobic brother and father played a part in that. I've never been homophobic. I don't see the point in investing emotions and anger into something that doesn't affect me. I actually think there's a strong case (almost definately true) for homophobia being a projection of something you resent in yourself. <br /><br /><br />Hence the "men's men" always being happy with each others company are also almost always the types to be outspokenly homophobic. Slly things human beings. <br /><br />And while we at sterotypes...policeman, priest or other "disclipined type authority figure"...good chance they are gay.The Roosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16969529144574975152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-74075560632821670102011-12-17T17:31:52.861+02:002011-12-17T17:31:52.861+02:00Another conundrum like race- where's the missi...Another conundrum like race- where's the missing homosexual gene. Is that also a social construct?<br /><br />You know what is very bitter. While you are making out a case for race being a social construct, and me that it also includes a biological base expressed by taxonomy, outside there in the real world the decision makers do not even in the slightest argue about DNA and the theoretical side of it (and most probably are not even aware of it) but act out policies according to the classical racial lines.<br /><br />Apartheid was attacked because of its racial policy and today with broad based black economic empowerment and a black government in place exactly that which Apartheid was being accused of is now being applied against the whites, regardless if it was a social construct or not, and regardless of if everyone was in a position of power to enforce those laws. These people do not even consider the theoretical side and the outcomes of the human genome project, they just carry on like there is race and they have a strong opinion of black and white. they do not sit and worry whether there is race or not, they just encroach into white territory in a determined way and do not adapt to white culture but force their way<br />onto the whites, like a swarm of locust descending into a corn field. For them there is no color bar, only an attitude of entitlement. Not the best of mankind is being imported. There is no control over the quality of people streaming in, regardless of race. Where you see degradation occurs and nothing is being done about it. Detroit. Johannesburg. Berlin. Paris. London. You name it. If there is no race, there certainly is a difference in ability. All the shit is being offloaded in traditional white territory, and that kind of swerves the national IQ to the left of the bell shaped curve and kills of initiative by those that still can maintain civilization.pincerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04011697755587471302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-40860153007621219822011-12-17T16:02:51.492+02:002011-12-17T16:02:51.492+02:00I was only joking about the 99% of men dying "...I was only joking about the 99% of men dying "on the job". Are you telling me that only 1% of men save enough to be able to eventually retire? That smacks of bad financial planning, not female chauvinism. On that note: remember to put some of your bonus into your retirement annuity. You get to save on tax as well provide for those "off the job" days. Adios to all until the New Year!Katzenjammerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14075423195892830101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-58335187049474963982011-12-17T15:52:46.915+02:002011-12-17T15:52:46.915+02:00Oh I almost forgot...Another definition of rape ac...Oh I almost forgot...Another definition of rape according to the femni-nazi's : having consentual sex with someone to appease them, or for money etc. What rubbish.The Roosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16969529144574975152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-6593589009680238642011-12-17T15:50:14.298+02:002011-12-17T15:50:14.298+02:00Let's be very clear about this. Real rape in t...Let's be very clear about this. Real rape in the traditional sense we think of a man forcing himself upon a woman is a very serious crime and their is no defending it. But is what the feminazi spew out when they manufacture their rape stats the same thing ?<br /><br />Not in the slightest. The rape stats they produce in western countries and here by rachel Jewkes include in the definition of rape "having sex with a woman while she had been drinkign alcohol" (consentual...apparently she can't consent when she's had drinks) ....having sex whith a woman younger than 18 even if you are yourself etc. <br /><br />If the same thing was reversed almost everh single man could also argue he has been raped. Why even when it's an older woman having sex with a younger man (underage) does society teach us it's hnot a big deal and he probably enjoyed it ? Why are women never responsible for their actions even when adults and why are men always responsible even when children ? <br /><br />But no, woman are all victims and men are all perverts and criminals. What a load of fucking bollocks and crocodile tears and I don't accept it. <br /><br />Let's not even bring up the taboo but very real topic of female rape fantasies. Women giving off mixed signals to urge the man to take the initiative. That would make me such an easy target for strawmabn arguments against the real rape that happens but let's not pretend that doesnt exist.<br /><br /><br />Or females crying wolf over rape for the most trivial of reasons (spite, embaressment etc) that ruins the lives of thousands of men. Oh no, I'll be the big bad wolf. Women can do no wrong.The Roosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16969529144574975152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-38818490990788809792011-12-17T13:46:53.790+02:002011-12-17T13:46:53.790+02:00"... do you know that 99% of people who die o..."... do you know that 99% of people who die on the job are male?"<br /><br />That's some consolation for rape victims.Katzenjammerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14075423195892830101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-52894732384598859332011-12-16T13:03:10.570+02:002011-12-16T13:03:10.570+02:00I'm curious to know to what Agenda scientists ...I'm curious to know to what Agenda scientists are bullsh1tting us about "race". I suggest you think it's something about weakening the white dominance and promoting socialism or something like that. Given that scientists are mostly private Enterprise high income white males that's a rather strange self defeating agenda no ? Especially for them to be doing it so on mass there's even a scientific consensus about the issue.<br /><br />I could understand if this was coming from the feminist lobby. They often make shit up about promoting gender equality when they are in fact promoting violating the rights of males and fiving special rights to females. <br /><br />Do you know a woman can kill your unborn child without your consent ? Try do that the other way around. Do you know what breast cancer awareness and charities receives 100 times more funding than testicular/prostate cancer despite them both being equally prevalent forms of cancer ? do you know that 99% of people who die on the job are male ? Etc etc<br /><br />Also they overstate female qualities and male shortcomings and understate male achievements etc. But why would men promote this type of twaddle ?The Roosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16969529144574975152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-47933218426168728562011-12-16T12:54:16.493+02:002011-12-16T12:54:16.493+02:00Oh dear Pincer. Spot the odd one out.
1) There...Oh dear Pincer. Spot the odd one out.<br /><br />1) There's an giant ape like creature living in the woods in northern america with big feet.<br /><br /><br />2) There's a long necked dinosaur type creature living in a loch in Ireland.<br /><br />3) 5 apples are more apples than 3 apples.<br /><br />4)All biologists and anthropologists are being forced by some huge conspiracy to deny the concept of race. <br /><br /><br />That's right folks...the answer is 3. Why ? All of them are believed by some people to be true....but.... because 3 unlike the others is not some kooky baseless, paranoid , imaginative myth it's the odd one out.The Roosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16969529144574975152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-85952600614982477642011-12-16T11:18:32.589+02:002011-12-16T11:18:32.589+02:00All very interesting, well written but full of inn...All very interesting, well written but full of inneuendo that is almost entirely bullshit. <br /><br />Around us in South Africa we see every day examples of black people who are more western than many of the local white people.<br /><br />100 000 years is a tiny amount of time for significant genetic variance to take place in a species that lives as relatively long as us and breeds so seldomly. A genetic variation (mutation) occurs roughly in 1 in a million reproductions. Even then whether or not that genetic mutation will be desirable or useful is not in itself likely. Yes due to environmental stuations it could be entire population groups died out who did not adjust well to climate changes etc. Those with lighter skin probably did not do well (or appear sexually selective/ healthy) in the warmer parts of the world and were seperated /bred out in some parts etc but all that has changed here is a gene that controls melanin levels. <br /><br />Also the harsher climates of Europe would have forced people to adjust and develop where in other parts of the world with more suitable climates it didn't require much creativity to survive. If the population groups swopped environments there's nothing to suggest the secluded from the world by the saharan desert whites of sub saharan africa wouldn't be the more "primitive" race. Not genetically anyway. As we said the entire human race shares 99.99% of the same genes although we look phenotypically quite a lot different. Nothing on the scale as a species like dogs though and very few behaviourists disagree that pretty much any breed of dog's behaviour relates to it's environment not genetics (althougn far more varied than ours...despite the myths or anthromoophic perceptions a doberman brought up in a nurturing stress free environment could be as tame as a mouse while a badly raised poodle could be the most ill tempered little snapper). <br /><br />And that's exactly what we'd expect from only 100 000 years of seperation: Not much difference. And every single day again we see how increasingly black people with education and western values confirm this. then we only need to watch "swamp people" or go parts in this country to see how ass backwards and savage some whites can be. <br /><br />Genes schmenes. Stop clutching at straws and perpetuating this mythology. Do you ever think how dumb and backwards you will appear be making these arguments to your grand children who grew up in mixed race schools and saw (as I did in private school) the absurdity of it all?The Roosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16969529144574975152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-54456813393451156292011-12-15T22:23:51.457+02:002011-12-15T22:23:51.457+02:00(Final)
In this view it works both ways, the dus...(Final) <br /><br />In this view it works both ways, the dusky cousin left to languish in warm climes has every right to retort in exactly the same terms…There is no intrinsic value difference, it is relative….Whether you regard a tomahawk missile as inferior to an assegai, or a computer chip better than a bongo drum is up to you to choose, depending which side of the mirror you are on…Remember, I’m not talking colossal time scales here, that is irrelevant, what counts is the Here and Now of human scale, no more than perhaps a few generations hence…Selfish genes in operation, which is the way things work in nature….<br /><br />To highlight my point here, I’ll leave you with a quote from Dawkins Book “The Ancestors Tale” (soft back ISBN 0 75381 996 1 – Page 33) Dawkins is relating the farmer’s tale in context of the agricultural revolution circa 10,000 BCE describing that <i>“it was probably more difficult to work out that it might be a good idea to keep back the best seed for planting, rather than follow the obvious course of eating the best and planting the dross”….. and he then recounts an anecdote about his father….” who as a young man, fresh out of college, taught agriculture to peasant farmers in central Africa in the 1940’s, and he tells me this is one of the hardest lessons to get across”</i> : )<br /><br />So keep your scale in focus, nobody really gives a tosh about the colossal scale of evolution except in abstract, academic terms…What counts is the human scale, as it impacts on our choices and the quality of our lives here and now…Lurkernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-29378140613707105572011-12-15T22:19:01.074+02:002011-12-15T22:19:01.074+02:00But on shorter scales there are many human races…I...But on shorter scales there are many human races…If we accept that a branch of humanity budded off from Africa circa 100,000 years ago and trekked North, natural selection began to work on this separation of the species, leading to the less marked but clearly measurable variations we see today…When a black looks at a white, they are not seeing a reflection of immediate shared humanity in recent history, but are staring obliquely at a mirror reflecting back into time, one hundred thousand years ago! WOW, amazing stuff evolutionary theory….<br /><br />So what does that mean? One hundred thousand years between races? On the colossal scale, it is correct (and politically more astute) to say, well, none really actually…However, on smaller scales, the differences can be huge. Races are the budding points of variation and on the HUMAN scale (lifetime less than 100 years) probably massive…We need to delve into issues of altruism, game theory and kinship here, but suffice it for me to put it facetiously: I have many cousins I would probably be prepared to lend R100 to, and 2nd cousins whom I don’t even know the name of and would hesitate to…Yet for my brother or sister, I happily give money out of love even with only a remote chance of recouping my “gift” back later…<br /><br />How much less a “cousin” divided in time by one Hundred Thousand years!Lurkernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-25291783211336625562011-12-15T22:15:04.778+02:002011-12-15T22:15:04.778+02:00"Whith what genetic difference does a race ac...<i>"Whith what genetic difference does a race actually become a race? 99%? 50%? 0% <br /><br />_____________<br /><br />Ex-fucking-actly !<br /><br />It doesn't ! A species yes, but not a race. There is no significant genetic variation between the human races so that it's valid to call anyone part of a "race" with xyz genetic make up."</i><br /><br />As a "lurker" in the background I've read this interchange with some interest over the last few days, the author’s comments above and the general thrust of it, is misleading...There is in fact no such thing as a speciation “event” The difference between species does not occur at any point at all and cannot be measured on small scales whatsoever.(leave aside the fact that at the gene level variations (strictly mutations) are true, discrete and measurable events in the single lifetime of individuals, some naturally selected, most not)<br /><br />Speciation is “spread” out over time so that eventually, over colossal periods, noticeable differences are observed . So this makes it difficult to pin point when one species, variation or race differs from another…<br /><br />…So then, are there no measurable differences? Of course there are! The larger the scale in time, the greater the difference …The shorter the scale, the less marked. In the case of the human race, if we accept the out of Africa theory as correct, which any sane biologist does, on the colossal time scale there is but one human species….<br /><br />TBCLurkernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-17083462987430328382011-12-15T21:01:12.445+02:002011-12-15T21:01:12.445+02:00But please don't think I'm out to "ne...But please don't think I'm out to "neg" women. My comments are reactionary to a war against males and their rights going on in the media and society. I am not prodding for the sake of it, I am just prodding back.The Roosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16969529144574975152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-30320782979391548182011-12-15T20:59:59.010+02:002011-12-15T20:59:59.010+02:00Well yes Rooster, a few men are more likely than w...Well yes Rooster, a few men are more likely than women to be geniuses, but then a few more men than women are likely to be drooling idiots or raving sociopaths.<br /><br />__________________<br /><br />That's is indeed true about intelligence but not being sociopaths. Men are more prominent indeed on both ends of the intellectual spectrum. But then boys will be boys and the femi-nazi hyper liberal schooling system fails boys drastically.<br /><br />Regarding being sociopaths women take the cake by a long shot. The entire vapid, devoid of self reflection fashion industry etc is testiment to this. <br /><br />Women are also more likely to abuse their spouses or abuse children. Stats are all out there if you would like to read them.The Roosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16969529144574975152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-55227838764665333252011-12-15T20:35:09.333+02:002011-12-15T20:35:09.333+02:00Well yes Rooster, a few men are more likely than w...Well yes Rooster, a few men are more likely than women to be geniuses, but then a few more men than women are likely to be drooling idiots or raving sociopaths. Having said that, I'm very happy with my new Defy gourmet multifunction oven that I had installed today. It keeps my husband happy - ditto the Miele dishwasher and the Range Rover Evoque in my garage, all paid for in cash. By me.<br /><br />Great are man's inventions! I'm a convinced consumer!<br /><br />Actually, I generally like men ... I can tell a real man when I see one. I just don't like men who neg women. So tell me, what red blooded male could possibly dislike a woman who drives a Range Rover Evoque?Katzenjammerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14075423195892830101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-20536199620041417102011-12-15T19:15:08.212+02:002011-12-15T19:15:08.212+02:00"I am outspoken about women generally having ..."I am outspoken about women generally having inferior intelligence to men etc."<br /><br />Really? Please do expand on the<br />______________<br /><br />We invented everything of any significance. We made any advances of any significance in the arts, technology, medicine, science etc<br /><br />We're 4 times more likely to be Geniuses that woman. <br /><br />I know women will say that this is because of historical oppression and all sorts of excuses but that's nonsense. Until very recent times very few men weren't opressed and had the luxury to study etc yet throughout history men's creativity and perseverance drag us out of the stone ages to the point you can be sure that just about every brick, pipe, cable, theory, device etc etc around you in this modern world was invented, put there, repaired, improved upon etc by a man.The Roosterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16969529144574975152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-2507455372559572342011-12-15T09:21:13.052+02:002011-12-15T09:21:13.052+02:00" ...you lot have your little circle jerk goi..." ...you lot have your little circle jerk going on about a world wide conspiracy against the white man by the NWO/zionists/bilderburg groups etc."<br /><br />Lol! You know that guy who's been harassing me, who I said I wouldn't name here anymore, this jerk says he is spending Christmas in Switzerland yadda yadda yadda and he's so well off in the UK huffa huffa huffa well the little fatso still phones me from his mousehole in Euxton every other middle of the night. The little fatso earns stuff all in the UK, he lives off the wifey. You may have a point, Rooster, about women generally acting dumber than men. But I think it has more to do with society ostracising women if they live without men, and that pressure very often comes from other women. Who the hell would want to hang out with a loser?Katzenjammerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14075423195892830101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1226267430376629917.post-69312404174554963022011-12-15T08:19:03.725+02:002011-12-15T08:19:03.725+02:00"I am outspoken about women generally having ..."I am outspoken about women generally having inferior intelligence to men etc."<br /><br />Really? Please do expand on the etc.Katzenjammerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14075423195892830101noreply@blogger.com